From metaphysics to ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis [Book Review]

Philosophical Review 109 (3):459-462 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review. From metaphysics to ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis.H. Lillehammer - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):169-173.
Concepts and conceptual analysis.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):253-282.
Deducing the mind.Andrew Gleeson - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (3-4):385-410.
Commentary on Frank Jackson’s From Metaphysics to Ethics.Katalin Balog - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):645–652.
Has psychology debunked conceptual analysis?Per Sandin - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 37 (1):26–33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
84 (#171,855)

6 months
2 (#518,672)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

D. Gene Witmer
University of Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mathematical truth.Paul Benacerraf - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.
A causal theory of knowing.Alvin I. Goldman - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (12):357-372.
A Causal Theory of Knowing.Alvin I. Goldman - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 18-30.
Mathematical Truth.Paul Benacerraf, Michael Jubien & Philip Kitcher - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (2):552-554.

Add more references