Environmental Ethics 12 (3):275-282 (1990)
AbstractI contrast metaphysical implications from physics and ecology and compare them through two concepts, the field, primary in physics and borrowed by ecology, and wholeness, postulated in ecology and borrowed by physics. I argue that several implications from physics are unacceptably reductive or erroneous and identify an old and a new ecology. Metaphysical implications from the old ecology are quite different from the new ecology, as weIl as from quantum or Newtonian physics
Similar books and articles
Analogical Thinking in Ecology: Looking beyond Disciplinary Boundaries.Mark Colyvan & Lev R. Ginzburg - 2010 - The Quarterly Review of Biology 85 (2):171--182.
The metaphysical implications of ecology.J. Baird Callicott - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (4):301-316.
Ecosystem ecology and metaphysical ecology: A case study.Karen J. Warren & Jim Cheney - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (2):99-116.
Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism: the Self in Environmental Philosophy.Colette Sciberras - 2002 - Dissertation, Lancaster
Deep ecology from the perspective of environmental science.Frank B. Golley - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (1):45-55.
The Metaphysical Implications of Modern Physics.Charles Weiss - 1931 - [New York, Printed by the Bristol Press.
Are ecology and evolutionary biology “soft” sciences?Massimo Pigliucci - 2002 - Annales Zoologici Finnici 39:87-98.
Struggling with the science of ecology.Jay Odenbaugh - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (3):395-409.
Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory.Harvey R. Brown & Rom Harré (eds.) - 1987 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Theoretical ecology as etiological from the start.Justin Donhauser - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 60:67-76.
References found in this work
No references found.