Continental Philosophy Review 46 (4):487-507 (2013)

This paper explores the political import of Husserl’s critical discussion of the epistemic effects of the formalization of rational thinking. More specifically, it argues that this discussion is of direct relevance to make sense of the pervasive processes of ‘technization’, that is, of a mechanistic and superficial generation and use of knowledge, to be observed in current contexts of governance. Building upon Husserl’s understanding of formalization as a symbolic technique for abstraction in the thinking with and about numbers, I argue that processes of technization, while being necessary and legitimate procedures for the reduction of complexities, also may give rise to politically unresponsive and ultimately dysfunctional ‘economies of thinking.’ This paper is structured in three parts. In the first part I outline Husserl’s account of the formalization and technization of thought and knowledge. In the second part I make my case for the political import of this account, departing in this context from positions that (a) regard Husserl’s discussions of formalization and its effects as merely epistemological, or that (b) try to mobilize Husserl for a one-sided critique of instrumental reason. In the final part I address a major shortcoming of Husserl’s account, namely its neglect of the concrete and historically evolving technological infrastructures of processes of formalization/technization
Keywords Formalization  Technization  Governance  Edmund Husserl  Knowledge  Symbolic technology  Political technology  Political rationality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11007-013-9277-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and Human Interests.Jürgen Habermas - 1971 - Heinemann Educational.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Philosophical Achievement of Jacob Klein.Burt Hopkins - 2011 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 11:282-296.
Mathematizing Phenomenology.Jeffrey Yoshimi - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3):271-291.
Husserl, Phenomenology, and Foundationalism.Walter Hopp - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):194 – 216.
Limitations of Formalization.Constantine Politis - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):356-360.
Heidegger's Early Critique of Husserl.Søren Overgaard - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.
Heidegger's Critique of Husserl's and Brentano's Accounts of Intentionality.Dermot Moran - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):39-65.
Husserl on Analyticity and Beyond.Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock - 2008 - Husserl Studies 24 (2):131-140.
Phenomenology and Technology.Iain Thomson - 2012 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.


Added to PP index

Total views
52 ( #218,027 of 2,506,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,380 of 2,506,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes