Replies to Commentators on The Concept of Argument: Clarifying Themes, Answering Questions, Settling Objections

Informal Logic 37 (4):247-321 (2017)
Authors
Harald Wohlrapp
Universität Hamburg
Abstract
The paper provides a series of responses to the papers published in Vol. 37, No. 3, of this journal that explored the ideas in Harald Wohlrapp’s _The Concept of Argument_, where arguing is understood as the theoretical or theory-forming activity that can be found in research of all kinds. Thus, the approach taken focuses on the validity of theses. This approach is clarified further as the author considers points raised by his commentators and provides answers and, where necessary, corrections.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.22329/il.v37i4.5004
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,941
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Futile Definitions.John Shand - 2008 - Think 6 (17-18):129-137.
Wohlrapp's Concept of Justification.Derek Allen - 2017 - Informal Logic 37 (3):170-182.
On Settling.Robert E. Goodin - 2012 - Princeton University Press.
Replies to Critics: Explaining Subjectivity.Peter Carruthers - 2000 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 6.
Replies to Commentators.Hilary Putnam - 2006 - Contemporary Pragmatism 3 (2):67-98.
The Meaning of Synthetic Gametes for Gay and Lesbian People and Bioethics Too.Timothy F. Murphy - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics (11):doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-10169.
A Critique of “the Best Secular Argument Against Abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Replies to My Critics.Hannah Ginsborg - 2016 - British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (4):409-419.
Replies to My Critics.[author unknown] - 2017 - British Journal of Aesthetics Current Issue 56 (4):409-419.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-07

Total downloads
3 ( #857,705 of 2,293,874 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #411,560 of 2,293,874 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature