Social Epistemology 34 (3):294-308 (2020)

Abstract
Voting is often said to be irrational because of the incredibly small likelihood that an individual voter’s ballot will be pivotal in favour of her preferred candidate or party. A persuasive respon...
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691728.2019.1709104
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Greek and Roman Voting and Elections.E. S. Staveley - 1972 - [London]Thames & Hudson.
Compulsory Voting: For and Against.Jason Brennan & Lisa Hill - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Upper House Elections in Japan and the Power of the 'Organized Vote'.Patrick Köllner - 2002 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 3 (1):113-137.
The Expressive Case Against Plurality Rule.Daniel Wodak - 2019 - Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (3):363-387.
The Rationality of Voting and Duties of Elected Officials.Marcus Arvan - 2017 - In Emily Crookston, David Killoren & Jonathan Trerise (eds.), Ethics in Politics: The Rights and Obligations of Individual Political Agents. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 239-253.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-02-11

Total views
4 ( #1,166,891 of 2,326,040 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #214,458 of 2,326,040 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes