Jeffrey Stout on democracy and its contemporary Christian critics

Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):633-647 (2005)

Authors
Abstract
Jeffrey Stout addresses two of the main criticisms of liberal democracy by its contemporary neotraditionalist Christian critics: that liberal democracy is destructive of social tradition, and thereby of virtue in the citizenry, and that liberal democracy is inherently secular, committed to expunging religious voices from the public arena. I judge that Stout effectively answers these charges: liberal democracy has its own tradition, it cultivates the virtues relevant to that, and it is not inherently hostile to piety. What Stout does not do, I suggest, is take the next step of showing, positively, that Christianity can and should affirm the substance of liberal democratic society. This is due, in good measure, to the fact that Stout never tells us, except in off-hand comments, what he takes the substance of liberal democracy to be. And this, in turn, is due to his way of employing pragmatism: he uses pragmatism to give an account of human society generally, not of liberal democratic society. I raise some questions about the general account that pragmatism gives of human society, and thus about the account that it would give of liberal democracy
Keywords virtue  norms  liberal democracy  Christian critics  pragmatism  secularism  tradition  social practices  accountability  discourse  moral obligation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00241.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,483
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Democracy and Tradition.Jeffrey Stout - 2003 - Princeton University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Comments on Six Responses to Democracy and Tradition.Jeffrey Stout - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):709-744.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberal Democracy Vs. Neo-Liberal Globalization.Mislav Kukoc - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:399-406.
The Pragmatic Turn in the Study of Religion.G. Scott Davis - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):659-668.
Philanthropy's Role in Liberal Democracy.Bruce R. Sievers - 2010 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (4):380-398.
Philosophical Essays.Teodros Kiros - 2011 - Red Sea Press.
The End of Liberal Democracy as We Have Known It?William L. McBride - 2006 - Social Philosophy Today 22 (2):117-126.
The Meaning of Democracy.Peter A. French - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:105-116.
Liberal Democracy and Radical Democracy.Gabriel Vargas Lozano - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:97-103.
Comments on Six Responses to Democracy and Tradition.Jeffrey Stout - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):709-744.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
55 ( #160,740 of 2,286,467 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #595,991 of 2,286,467 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature