Acta Analytica 17 (1):151-170 (2002)

Michael Wolf
Washington and Jefferson College
In this paper, I will outline some of the important points made by Kripke and Putnam on the meaning of natural kind terms. Their notion of the baptism of natural kinds- the process by which kind terms are initially introduced into the language — is of special concern here. I argue that their accounts leave some ambiguities that suggest a baptism of objects and kinds that is free of additional theoretical commitments. Both authors suggest that we name the stuff and then let the scientists tell us what properties it really has, and hence what the real meaning is. I contend that such a barren baptism, taken at face value, cannot succeed in the semantic roles it has been assigned and that softening the stance on baptism suggests a more subtle and complex relation between reference and theoretical commitment than has emerged thus far.
Keywords Kripke  Putnam  Reference  Baptism  Meaning  Natural Kind Term
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1007/BF03177512
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
Studies in the Logic of Explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
Meaning and Reference.Hilary Putnam - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):699-711.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
173 ( #68,851 of 2,519,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,550 of 2,519,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes