On comparison of theories by their contents

Studia Logica 48 (4):617 - 622 (1989)
Popper's definition of verisimilitude was criticized for its paradoxical consequences in the case of false theories. The aim of this paper is to show that paradoxes disappear if the falsity content of a theory is defined with help of dCn or Cn –1.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00370211
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Objective Knowledge.Karl R. Popper - 1972 - Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Truthlikeness.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):297-300.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
What is Wrong with Verisimilitude.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:511-541.
A Limited Defense of the Pessimistic Induction.Jesse Hobbs - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):171-191.
The Language Dependence of Accuracy.Eric Barnes - 1990 - Synthese 84 (1):59 - 95.
Popper's Account of Acceptability.R. G. Swinburne - 1971 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):167 – 176.
Verisimilitude Based on Concept Analysis.Ewa Orłowska - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (3):307 - 320.
Verisimilitude or the Approach to the Whole Truth.Herbert Keuth - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (3):311-336.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

11 ( #400,871 of 2,164,635 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,014 of 2,164,635 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums