Rethinking empiricism and materialism: the revisionist view

Annales Philosophici 1 (1):101-113 (2010)
There is an enduring story about empiricism, which runs as follows: from Locke onwards to Carnap, empiricism is the doctrine in which raw sense-data are received through the passive mechanism of perception; experience is the effect produced by external reality on the mind or ‘receptors’. Empiricism on this view is the ‘handmaiden’ of experimental natural science, seeking to redefine philosophy and its methods in conformity with the results of modern science. Secondly, there is a story about materialism, popularized initially by Marx and Engels and later restated as standard, ‘textbook’ history of philosophy in the English-speaking world. It portrays materialism as explicitly mechanistic, seeking to reduce the world of qualities, sensations, and purposive behaviour to a quantitative, usually deterministic physical scheme. Building on some recent scholarship, I aim to articulate the contrarian view according to which neither of these stories is true. On the contrary, empiricism turns out to be less ‘science-friendly’ and more concerned with moral matters; materialism reveals itself to be, in at least a large number of cases, a ‘vital’, anti-mechanistic doctrine which focuses on the unique properties of organic beings. This revision of two key philosophical episodes should reveal that our history of early modern philosophy is dependent to a great extent on ‘special interests’, whether positivistic or Kantian, and by extension lead us to rethink the relation and distinction between ‘science’ and ‘philosophy’ in this period.
Keywords empiricism  materialism
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Newton and Spinoza: On Motion and Matter (and God, of Course).Eric Schliesser - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):436-458.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Panpsychism or Evolutionary Materialism.Roy Wood Sellars - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (October):329-49.
Must Empiricism Be Materialistic and Behavioristic?A. Campbell Garnett - 1950 - Journal of Philosophy 47 (April):250-255.
Some Questions About Donald Williams' Defense of Materialism.Max Black - 1946 - Philosophical Review 55 (September):572-579.
“Empiricism Contra Experiment: Harvey, Locke and the Revisionist View of Experimental Philosophy”.Alan Salter & Charles T. Wolfe - 2009 - Bulletin d'histoire et d'épistémologie des sciences de la vie 16 (2):113-140.
Positivism and Materialism.Roy Wood Sellars - 1946 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 7 (1):12-41.
Constructive Empiricism Now.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 106 (1-2):151 - 170.
Challenges to Empiricism.Harold Morick (ed.) - 1972 - Belmont, Calif., Wadsworth Pub. Co..
Is Empiricism Coherent?Albert Casullo - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:61-74.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
378 ( #8,251 of 2,214,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #46,694 of 2,214,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature