Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant. Eine Stellungnahme zu Theodor Eberts Gegeneinwänden. Teil 2

Abstract
In an earlier article (see J Gen Philos Sei (2010) 41: 341-355) I have compared Aristotle's syllogistic with Kant's theory of "pure ratiocination". "Ratiocinia pura" („reine Vernunftschlüsse") is Kant's designation for assertoric syllogisms Aristotle has called 'perfect'. In Kant's view they differ from non-pure ratiocinia precisely in that their validity rests only on the validity of the Dictum de omni et nullo (which, however, in Kant's view can be further reduced to more fundamental principles) whereas the validity of non-pure ratiocinia additionally presupposes the validity of inferences which Kant calls consequentiae immediatae. I have argued that Kant's view is in some (not in all) essential features in accordance with Aristotle's view concerning perfect syllogisms and certainly leading to a tenable and interesting logical theory. As a result I have rejected not only the interpretation of Aristotle adopted by Theodor Ebert, but also the objections he has raised against Kant's logical theory. As far as Aristotle is concerned, Ebert has attempted to defend his position in the first part of his reply to my article published in J Gen Philos Sei (2009) 40: 357-365, and I have argued against this defence in issue 1 of the J Gen Philos Sei (2010) 41: 199-213 (cf. Ebert's answer in the same issue pp. 215-231). In the following discussion I deal with Eberts defence of his criticism of Kant published in the second part of his reply to my article (see J Gen Philos Sei (2009) 40: 365-372). I shall argue, that Kant's principle 'nota notae est nota rei ipsius' and his use of technical vocabulary stand up to the objections raised by Ebert. His attempts to prove that Kant's logical theory is defective are based on several misinterpretations
Keywords Kant’s logic   Ratiocinia pura (“reine Vernunftschlüsse”)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10838-010-9136-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,191
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics.W. D. Ross - 1950 - Philosophy 25 (95):380-382.
Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant.Michael Wolff - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):341-355.
Abhandlung Über Die Prinzipien der Logik.Michael Wolff - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (3):444-445.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
S4 and Aristotle on Three Syllogisms with Contingent Premisses.Charles J. Kelly - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:405-431.
Aristotle'S Natural Deduction Reconsidered.John M. Martin - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (1):1-15.
Syllogisms with Fractional Quantifiers.Fred Johnson - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (4):401 - 422.
Michael Wolff über Beweise für vollkommene Syllogismen bei Aristoteles.Theodor Ebert - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):215 - 231.
Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant.Michael Wolff - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):341-355.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-06-09

Total downloads

32 ( #161,319 of 2,172,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums