Sorites 19:58-60 (2007)
AbstractAny discussion regarding the famous Sorites Paradox is incomplete without considering the value of contextual logic and its meta-language of vagueness. Wittgenstein, though he did not write extensively on the Sorites Paradox in particular, is deeply concerned with its supposed implications. The later Wittgenstein's treatment of logical vagueness in natural and formal languages, and his accompanying treatment of logical soundness as it applies to ordinary languages is thus of considerable help when thinking about the Sorites Paradox. In this paper I pair the later Wittgenstein's treatment of meaning in context with the age-old problem, manifest in the Sorites Paradox, of what happens when we apply induction ad infinitum to a seemingly stable item in a specific, meaning-bearing lexicon
Similar books and articles
Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox.Richard Dewitt - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites.Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
Facing Up to the Sorites Paradox.Terry Horgan - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 6:99-111.
Sorites paradox and conscious experience.Tamás Pólya & László Tarnay - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):165-165.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads