“Was Canguilhem a biochauvinist? Goldstein, Canguilhem and the project of ‘biophilosophy’"


Canguilhem is known to have regretted, with some pathos, that Life no longer serves as an orienting question in our scientific activity. He also frequently insisted on a kind of uniqueness of organisms and/or living bodies – their inherent normativity, their value-production and overall their inherent difference from mere machines. In addition, Canguilhem acknowledged a major debt to the German neurologist-theoretician Kurt Goldstein, author most famously of The Structure of the Organism in 1934; along with Merleau-Ponty, Canguilhem was the main figure who introduced the work of Goldstein and his ‘phenomenology of embodiment’ into France. In this paper I inquire if we should view Canguilhem and Goldstein as ‘biochauvinists’, that is, as thinkers who consider that there is something inherently unique about biological entities as such, and if so, of what sort.

Download options


External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

947 (#7,243)

6 months
49 (#16,515)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Georges Canguilhem als Medizinhistoriker.Caspar Grond-Ginsbach - 1996 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 19 (4):235-244.
On the Vitality of Vitalism.Monica Greco - 2005 - Theory, Culture and Society 22 (1):15-27.
On the Normativity of the Immune System.Amin T. Turki - 2011 - Medicine Studies 3 (1):29-39.
Bibliographie Des travaux de Georges Canguilhem.G. Canguilhem - 1985 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 90 (1):99 - 105.
Canguilhem Et les Normes.Guillaume Le Blanc - 1998 - Presses Universitaires de France - PUF.
Narrative and Epistemology: Georges Canguilhem's Concept of Scientific Ideology.Cristina Chimisso - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:64-73.
Vitalism as Pathos.Thomas Osborne - 2016 - Biosemiotics 9 (2):185-205.