Journal of Business Ethics 15 (10):1051 - 1064 (1996)
A recent wave of public interest surrounding the alleged advertising of cigarettes to children has raised First Amendment issues under the commercial speech doctrine. The two most vocal sides of this debate are sharply divided over the amount of constitutional protection that should be offered to tobacco advertisers. Proponents of restrictions on such ads argue that commercial speech does not advance any ideas worth preserving and is consequently deserving of less protection than other forms of speech. Their opponents assert that commercial speech should be offered wide protection because of its role in contributing to individual autonomy in the marketplace of ideas through informing consumer choice. While I believe that commercial speech should be offered broad protection, I will argue that severe restrictions are morally justifiable and legally defensible when it comes to advertising to children, particularly with respect to harmful products. Since the free market of ideas model is premised upon a notion that there are reasonable consumers that can discern falsehood from truth, this model is invalidated when it comes to children since they cannot be expected to possess the same capacity for judgment as adults.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Introduction to the Special Thematic Symposium on the Ethics of Controversial Online Advertising.Caroline Moraes & Nina Michaelidou - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 141 (2):231-233.
Similar books and articles
Meet the Parents: A Parents' Perspective on Product Placement in Children's Films. [REVIEW]Simon Hudson, David Hudson & John Peloza - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):289 - 304.
Tobacco Targeting: The Ethical Complexity of Marketing to Minorities. [REVIEW]Elise Truly Sautter & Nancy A. Oretskin - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (10):1011-1017.
The Advertising Industry's Defense of its First Amendment Rights.John H. Crowley - 1993 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 8 (1):5 – 16.
Rhetoric, Divorce and International Human Rights: The Limits of Divorce Reform for the Protection of Children.Barbara Stark - manuscript
Free Speech as Risk Analysis: Heuristics, Biases, and Institutions in the First Amendment.Paul Horwitz - manuscript
Children and the Changing World of Advertising.Elizabeth S. Moore - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (2):161-167.
Should Commercial Speech Have First Amendment Protection?Michael Davis - 1980 - Social Theory and Practice 6 (2):123-150.
Taking the Right of Freedom of Commerical Communication Seriously.Vaughana Macy Feary - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (1):47 - 59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #239,627 of 2,177,852 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,552 of 2,177,852 )
How can I increase my downloads?