International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (3):155-165 (2009)
AbstractOne version of the argument for design relies on the assumption that the apparent fine-tuning of the universe for the existence of life requires an explanation. I argue that the assumption is false. Philosophers who argue for the assumption usually appeal to analogies, such as the one in which a person was to draw a particular straw among a very large number of straws in order not to be killed. Philosophers on the other side appeal to analogies like the case of winning a lottery. I analyze the two analogies and explain why the lottery analogy is the right one to use. In the light of such an analysis, we can see that although the cosmic feature of being life-permitting is rare, it does not allow life-permitting possible universes to stand out because there are other rare cosmic features that other possible universes have.
Similar books and articles
The Ethics of Lottery Advertising: Issues and Evidence. [REVIEW]James M. Stearns & Shaheen Borna - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (1):43 - 51.
A Challenge to the Compound Lottery Axiom: A Two-Stage Normative Structure and Comparison to Other Theories.Donald B. Davis - 1994 - Theory and Decision 37 (3):267.
What Lottery Problem for Reliabilism?Juan Comesaña - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):1-20.
Don’T Know, Don’T Believe: Reply to Kroedel.Clayton Littlejohn - 2013 - Logos and Episteme 4 (2):231-38.
Reconsidering the Lessons of the Lottery for Knowledge and Belief.Glenn Ross - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (1):37-46.
A Review of the Lottery Paradox.Gregory Wheeler - 2007 - In William Harper & Gregory Wheeler (eds.), Probability and Inference: Essays in Honour of Henry E. Kyburg, Jr.
Does Lottery Advertising Exploit Disadvantaged and Vulnerable Markets?Harriet A. Stranahan - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):23-35.
Safety, The Lottery Puzzle, and Misprinted Lottery Results.Mark Mcevoy - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:47-49.
The Persistent Problem of the Lottery Paradox: And Its Unwelcome Consequences for Contextualism.Travis Timmerman - 2013 - Logos and Episteme (I):85-100.
Coevolution of the Cosmic Past and Future: The Selfish Biocosm as a Closed Timelike Curve: A Recipe for Cosmic Ontogeny and a Blueprint for Cosmic Reproduction.James N. Gardner - 2005 - Complexity 10 (5):14-21.
Lottery Dependent Utility: A Reexamination.Ulrich Schmidt - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (1):35-58.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God.J. L. MacKie - 1982 - Oxford University Press.