Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):27-42 (2013)
Philosophers have talked to each other about moral issues concerning technology, but few of them have talked about issues of technology and the good life, and even fewer have talked about technology and the good life with the public in the form of recommendation. In effect, recommendations for various technologies are often left to technologists and gurus. Given the potential benefits of informing the public on their impacts on the good life, however, this is a curious state of affairs. In the present paper, I will examine why philosophers are seemingly reluctant to offer recommendations to the public. While there are many reasons for philosophers to refrain from offering recommendations, I shall focus on a specific normative reason. More specifically, it appears that, according to a particular definition, offering recommendations can be viewed as paternalistic, and therefore is prima facie wrong to do so. I will provide an argument to show that the worry about paternalism is unfounded, because a form of paternalism engendered by technology is inevitable. Given the inevitability of paternalism, I note that philosophers should accept the duty to offer recommendations to the public. I will then briefly turn to design ethics, which has reconceptualised the role of philosophers and, in my mind, fitted well with the inevitability of paternalism. Finally, I shall argue that design ethics has to be supplemented by the practice of recommendation if it is to sustain its objective
|Keywords||Paternalism Recommendation Design ethics Good life Role of philosopher|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad.Michael Walzer - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (273):472-475.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Technological Paternalism: On How Medicine has Reformed Ethics and How Technology Can Refine Moral Theory.Bjørn Hofmann - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):343-352.
Technology and the Good Life?Eric Higgs, Andrew Light & David Strong (eds.) - 2000 - University of Chicago Press.
Rethinking Technology, Revitalizing Ethics: Overcoming Barriers to Ethical Design.Patrick Feng - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):207-220.
Is Technology Good for Us? A Eudaimonic Meta-Model for Evaluating the Contributive Capability of Technologies for a Good Life.Edward Spence - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (3):335-343.
Why It's Time to Stop Worrying About Paternalism in Health Policy.J. Wilson - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):269-279.
Facing Up to Paternalism in Research Ethics.Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (3):24-34.
Ethics and Technology Design.Anders Albrechtslund - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):63-72.
Ethical Issues in Interaction Design.Toni Robertson - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (2):49-59.
A Definition of Paternalism.Simon Clarke - 2002 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (1):81-91.
New on Paternalism and Public Policy.Thomas C. Leonard, Robert S. Goldfarb & Steven M. Suranovic - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):323-331.
Is Public Health Paternalism Really Never Justified? A Response to Joel Feinberg.Thaddeus Mason Pope - manuscript
Paternalism and Fairness in Clinical Research.Lynn A. Jansen & Steven Wall - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (3):172-182.
Invoking Politics and Ethics in the Design of Information Technology: Undesigning the Design. [REVIEW]Martin Brigham & Lucas D. Introna - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):1-10.
Added to index2011-07-02
Total downloads40 ( #129,881 of 2,171,798 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,798 )
How can I increase my downloads?