Accountability and responsibility in research

Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600 (1991)
Abstract
Fraud and misconduct in scientific research appears to be increasing since 1980 when several cases were disclosed. Earlier instances were handled awkwardly, but the scientific community has since mobilized and issued guidelines about responding to allegations of misconduct and about the responsible conduct of research. Scientists, editors and the institutions of science are slowly learning how to cope with this problem.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00382878
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Developing a Federal Policy on Research Misconduct.Sybil Francis - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):261-272.
Ethics and Accounting Doctoral Education.Stephen E. Loeb - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):817 - 828.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Co-Responsibility for Research Integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

21 ( #235,823 of 2,164,867 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #84,123 of 2,164,867 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums