Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600 (1991)
Fraud and misconduct in scientific research appears to be increasing since 1980 when several cases were disclosed. Earlier instances were handled awkwardly, but the scientific community has since mobilized and issued guidelines about responding to allegations of misconduct and about the responsible conduct of research. Scientists, editors and the institutions of science are slowly learning how to cope with this problem.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Business Research, Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, and the Inherent Responsibility of Scholars.Michael Gonin - 2007 - Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (1):33-58.
Fixing the Game? Legitimacy, Morality Policy and Research in Gambling.Rohan Miller & Grant Michelson - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (3):601-614.
Confronting Misconduct in Science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has Not Been Accomplished?Nicholas H. Steneck - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):161-176.
Developing a Federal Policy on Research Misconduct.Sybil Francis - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):261-272.
Ethics and Accounting Doctoral Education.Stephen E. Loeb - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):817 - 828.
Similar books and articles
The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is Responsible for What? [REVIEW]Katherine Alfredo & Hillary Hart - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):447-457.
The Role of the National Science Foundation Broader Impacts Criterion in Enhancing Research Ethics Pedagogy.Seth D. Baum, Michelle Stickler, James S. Shortle, Klaus Keller, Kenneth J. Davis, Donald A. Brown, Erich W. Schienke & Nancy Tuana - 2009 - Social Epistemology 23 (3):317-336.
Co-Responsibility for Research Integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.Arthur Bonito, Sandra Titus & David Wright - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct.Michael C. Loui - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):529-539.
Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct.Jean-Philippe Breittmayer, Martine Bungener, Hugues De The, Evelyne Eschwege, Michel Fougereau, Gilles Guedj, Claude Kordon, Olivier Philippe, Maric-Catherine Postel-Vinay & Laurence Schaffar-Esterle - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):41-48.
Evolving Research Misconduct Policies and Their Significance for Physical Scientists.James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Beyond Conflict of Interest: The Responsible Conduct of Research.Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):459-468.
Effectiveness of Research Guidelines in Prevention of Scientific Misconduct.Eleanor G. Shore - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #235,823 of 2,164,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,123 of 2,164,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?