Addressing the Continued Circulation of Retracted Research as a Design Problem

GW Journal of Ethics in Publishing 1 (1) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the continued circulation and use of retracted science as a complex problem: Multiple stakeholders throughout the publishing ecosystem hold competing perceptions of this problem and its possible solutions. We describe how we used a participatory design process model to co-develop recommendations for addressing this problem with stakeholders in the Alfred P. Sloan-funded project, Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science (RISRS). After introducing the four core RISRS recommendations, we discuss how the issue of retraction-related stigma gives rise to recommendation #4, Educate stakeholders about retraction and pre- and post-publication stewardship of the scholarly record. This recommendation is important for training publishing professionals and realizing this recommendation will require further collaborative design work across scholarly communications. We highlight ongoing stakeholder work which is now re-starting the design cycle. We conclude with a discussion of ongoing activities facilitating uptake and refinement of RISRS research and the implementation agenda.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Retractions in Science.K. Brad Wray & Line Edslev Andersen - 2018 - Scientometrics 117 (3):2009-2019.
The Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks.Charisse R. Madlock-Brown & David Eichmann - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):127-137.
Retraction of Published Research.David Celiberti & Frank Cicero - 2020 - Science in Autism Treatment 17 (11):1-4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-22

Downloads
18 (#607,505)

6 months
18 (#53,805)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jodi Schneider
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Retraction Watch.Udo Schüklenk - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (6):ii-ii.

Add more references