David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kantian Review 12 (2):1-39 (2007)
People talk about rats deserting a sinking ship, but they don't usually ask where the rats go. Perhaps this is only because the answer is so obvious: of course, most of the rats climb aboard the sounder ships, the ships that ride high in the water despite being laden with rich cargoes of cheese and grain and other things rats love, the ships that bring prosperity to ports like eighteenth-century Königsberg and firms such as Green & Motherby. By making the insulting comparison - as I am in the course of doing – between us Kant scholars and a horde of noxious vermin, my more or less transparent aim is to mitigate, or at least to distract attention from, the collective immodesty of what I am saying about us. For my point is that, in the past half-century or so, Kant studies has become a very prosperous ship indeed. Its success has even been the chief thing that has buoyed all its sister ships in the fleet of modern philosophy, most of which are also doing very well
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Aaron Bunch (2010). 'Objective Validity' and 'Objective Reality' in Kant's B-Deduction of the Categories. Kantian Review 14 (2):67-92.
Similar books and articles
Sebastian Gardner (2005). Review of Henry E. Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, Revised and Enlarged Edition. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (9).
Jill Vance Buroker (1984). Incongruence and the Unity of Transcendental Idealism: Reply to Allison. Topoi 3 (2):177-180.
Malte Hossenfelder (1990). Review: Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. [REVIEW] Inquiry 33 (4):467 – 479.
Lior Nitzan (2010). The Thought of an Object and the Object of Thought: A Critique of Henry E. Allison's 'Two Aspect' View. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (2):176-198.
Paul Guyer & Henry E. Allison (2006). Dialogue: Paul Guyer and Henry Allison on Allison's Kant's Theory of Taste. In Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Dennis Schulting (2010). Kant's Idealism: The Current Debate. In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.
Henry E. Allison (2006). Transcendental Realism, Empirical Realism and Transcendental Idealism. Kantian Review 11 (1):1-28.
Henry E. Allison (2004). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Yale University Press.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2001). Freedom and the Distinction Between Phenomena and Noumena: Is Allison's View Methodological, Metaphysical, or Equivocal? Journal of Philosophical Research 26:593-622.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads259 ( #11,352 of 1,925,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #107,544 of 1,925,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?