Dialectical Considerations on the Logic of Contradiction: Part I

Logic Journal of the IGPL 13 (2):231-260 (2005)
Abstract
This is an examination of the dialectical structure of deep disagreements about matters not open to empirical check. A dramatic case in point is the Law of Non-Contradiction . Dialetheists are notoriously of the view that, in some few cases, LNC has a true negation. The traditional position on LNC is that it is non-negotiable. The standard reason for thinking it non-negotiable is, being a first principle, there is nothing to negotiate. One of my purposes is to show that the first-principle defence of LNC is inadequate. A second purpose is to argue that it flows from this inadequacy that LNC stands or falls on economic considerations, much in the spirit of Quine's pragmatism about logic generally. This is a tactical victory for dialetheists. It gives them room to make the case against LNC on cost-benefit grounds. As things presently stand, no such case can be considered decisive. But, given that costs and benefits shift with changing circumstances, it is possible that a winning case for the dialetheist may present itself in the future. Notwithstanding the rivalry between consistentists and dialetheists, they share a common opponent. This is trivialism, the doctrine that everything whatever is true. It is an ironic alliance, in as much as the dialetheist's case against the consistentist can be adapted to a defence of trivialism. How damaging this turns out to be depends on the adequacy of the reasons for the dialetheist's rejection of trivialism. My further purpose is to show that the damage is slighter than dialetheists commonly believe
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jigpal/jzi016
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,472
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
To Be and Not to Be: Dialectical Tense Logic.Graham Priest - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):249 - 268.
Power and Knowledge: A Dialectical Contradiction.Garry Potter - 2010 - Journal of Critical Realism 9 (2):133-154.
Consistency and Contradiction.Burkhard Tuschling - 1988 - Philosophy and Theology 2 (4):327-361.
On The Problem of Contradiction in Dialectical Logic.I. S. Narskii - 1968 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 6 (4):3-10.
Łukasiewicz on the Principle of Contradiction.Venanzio Raspa - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:57-112.
Conjunction and Contradiction.Achille C. Varzi - 2004 - In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Clarendon Press. pp. 93–110.
The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47.
On Contradiction.Zedong Mao - 1953 - New York: International Publishers.
A Dialectical Contradiction is Not "A and Not-A". Rujdui - 1982 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 13 (4):3-8.
Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total downloads
43 ( #128,441 of 2,210,885 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #356,854 of 2,210,885 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature