Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):115-147 (2013)

Authors
Ashley Woodward
Dundee University
Abstract
This paper critically examines Deleuze’s treatment of the Nietzschean problem of nihilism. Of all the major figures in contemporary continental thought, Deleuze is at once one of the most luminous, and practically a lone voice in suggesting that nihilism may successfully be overcome. Whether or not he is correct on this point is thus a commanding question in relation to our understanding of the issue. Many commentators on Nietzsche have argued that his project of overcoming nihilism is destined to failure because of the affinity between the problem of nihilism and the logic of negation. While Nietzsche wants an absolute affirmation of life, Spinoza’s principle that “all determination is negation,” as well as Hegel’s dialectical conception of negation, suggest that affirmation free of negation is not possible. However, some commentators indicate that Deleuze successfully shows how overcoming nihilism is possible because his “logic of difference” allows for an affirmation which is not dialectically reappropriated by negation. This paper argues that beyond such logical considerations, there are metaphysical and existential reasons why Deleuze’s interpretation of nihilism fails to show that it can be overcome. For Deleuze, the overcoming of nihilism hinges not just on a logic of difference, but on a radical interpretation of Nietzsche’s doctrine of eternal return as “selective being.” Drawing on recent scholarship and on Nietzsche’s own writings I argue that this is not a tenable interpretation, and also, more importantly, that the metaphysical and existential implications of this understanding of eternal return reinstate nihilism at the very point where it is supposedly overcome. Moreover, I argue that there are attendant ethical and political dangers to Deleuze’s position on nihilism
Keywords Deleuze  Nietzsche  Nihilism  Eternal return  Difference
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11007-013-9245-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,775
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Nihilism, Neonihilism, Hypernihilism: ‘Nietzsche aujourd’hui’ Today?Ashley Woodward - 2019 - Nietzsche Studien Gesamtregister Bände 1-20 48 (1):244-264.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deleuze/Derrida: Towards an Almost Imperceptible Difference.Kir Kuiken - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):290-310.
Nietzsche and the Eternal Return of Sacrifice.K. D. - 2003 - Research in Phenomenology 33 (1):167-185.
Nihilism Before Nietzsche.Michael Allen Gillespie - 1995 - University of Chicago Press.
Camus and Nihilism.Ashley Woodward - 2011 - Sophia 50 (4):543-559.
Nihilism and the Postmodern in Vattimo's Nietzsche.Ashley Woodward - 2002 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):51-67.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-19

Total views
158 ( #63,870 of 2,432,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,105 of 2,432,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes