Logical Partisanhood

Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1203-1224 (2019)

Abstract

A natural suggestion and increasingly popular account of how to revise our logical beliefs treats revision of logic analogously to the revision of scientific theories. I investigate this approach and argue that simple applications of abductive methodology to logic result in revision-cycles, developing a detailed case study of an actual dispute with this property. This is problematic if we take abductive methodology to provide justification for revising our logical framework. I then generalize the case study, pointing to similarities with more recent and popular heterodox logics such as naïve logics of truth. I use this discussion to motivate a constraint—logical partisanhood—on the uses of such methodology: roughly: both the proposed alternative and our actual background logic must be able to agree that moving to the alternative logic is no worse than staying put.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-17

Downloads
291 (#38,034)

6 months
18 (#48,081)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.
Saving Truth From Paradox.Hartry Field - 2008 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Varieties of Logic.Stewart Shapiro - 2014 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Limits of Abductivism About Logic.Ulf Hlobil - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):320-340.
Generalized Revenge.Julien Murzi & Lorenzo Rossi - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (1):153-177.
Logical Predictivism.Ben Martin & Ole Hjortland - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (2):285-318.
What Counts as Evidence for a Logical Theory?Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (7):250.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (3):631-658.
How Do Logics Explain?Nicole Wyatt & Gillman Payette - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1):157-167.
Advice on Abductive Logic.Dov Gabbay & John Woods - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):189-219.
Intertranslatability, Theoretical Equivalence, and Perversion.Jack Woods - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):58-68.
Abduction is Not Deduction-in-Reverse.Marta Cialdea Mayer & Fiora Pirri - 1996 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 4 (1):95-108.
The Philosophy of Alternative Logics.Andrew Aberdein & Stephen Read - 2009 - In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 613-723.
Propositional Abduction in Modal Logic.Marta Cialdea Mayer & Fiora Pirri - 1995 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 3 (6):907-919.
The New Logic.D. Gabbay & J. Woods - 2001 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 9 (2):141-174.
Logic May Be Simple. Logic, Congruence and Algebra.Jean-Yves Béziau - 1997 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 5:129-147.
Translation Paradox and Logical Translation: A Study in Universal Logic.Tzu-Keng Fu - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 13:39-45.
Abductive Equivalence in First-Order Logic.Katsumi Inoue & Chiaki Sakama - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):333-346.