Model Theory, Hume's Dictum, and the Priority of Ethical Theory
Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 4:419-440 (2017)
Abstract
It is regrettably common for theorists to attempt to characterize the Humean dictum that one can’t get an ‘ought’ from an ‘is’ just in broadly logical terms. We here address an important new class of such approaches which appeal to model-theoretic machinery. Our complaint about these recent attempts is that they interfere with substantive debates about the nature of the ethical. This problem, developed in detail for Daniel Singer’s and Gillian Russell and Greg Restall’s accounts of Hume’s dictum, is of a general type arising for the use of model-theoretic structures in cashing out substantive philosophical claims: the question of whether an abstract model-theoretic structure successfully interprets something often involves taking a stand on non-trivial issues surrounding the thing. In the particular case of Hume’s dictum, given reasonable conceptual or metaphysical claims about the ethical, Singer’s and Russell and Restall’s accounts treat obviously ethical claims as descriptive and vice versa. Consequently, their model-theoretic characterizations of Hume’s dictum are not metaethically neutral. This encourages skepticism about whether model-theoretic machinery suffices to provide an illuminating distinction between the ethical and the descriptiveAuthor Profiles
DOI
10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.014
My notes
Similar books and articles
From Hume's Dictum Via Submergence to Composition as Identity or Mereological Nihilism.Einar Duenger Bohn - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (1):336-355.
What is Hume's Dictum, and why believe it?Jessica Wilson - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3):595 - 637.
Peter Abelard's Theory of the Proposition.Kevin Stephen Guilfoy - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Washington
Morgan’s Canon, meet Hume’s Dictum: avoiding anthropofabulation in cross-species comparisons.Cameron Buckner - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (5):853-871.
Reid's Criticism of Hume's Theory of Personal Identity.Harry Lesser - 1978 - Hume Studies 4 (2):41-63.
Hume's Utilitarian Theory of Right Action.Jordan-Howard Sobel - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):55-72.
Hume on the cartesian theory of substance.Daniel E. Flage & Ronald J. Glass - 1984 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):497-508.
Altruism and sympathy in Hume's ethics.Robert J. Lipkin - 1987 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (1):18 – 32.
Árdal on the Moral Sentiments in Hume's Treatise.Thomas K. Hearn - 1973 - Philosophy 48 (185):288-292.
Árdal on the Moral Sentiments in Hume's "Treatise".Thomas K. Hearn - 1973 - Philosophy 48 (185):288 - 292.
Beyond sympathy: Smith’s rejection of Hume’s moral theory.Paul Sagar - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (4):681-705.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-10-26
Downloads
256 (#48,156)
6 months
39 (#34,190)
2017-10-26
Downloads
256 (#48,156)
6 months
39 (#34,190)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Hyperintensionality and Normativity.Federico L. G. Faroldi - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
On the (in)significance of Hume’s Law.Samuele Chilovi & Daniel Wodak - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):633-653.
Footing the Cost (of Normative Subjectivism).Jack Woods - forthcoming - In Jussi Suikkanen & Antti Kauppinen (eds.), Methodology and Moral Philosophy. Routledge.
Expressivism and moral independence.Elliot Salinger - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
References found in this work
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment.Allan Gibbard - 1990 - Harvard University Press.
The moral fixed points: new directions for moral nonnaturalism.Terence Cuneo & Russ Shafer-Landau - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (3):399-443.