Classical Quarterly 68 (1):192-198 (2018)

Anna Woodman
University of Alberta
‘Who wrote the scurrilous iambic poems of the first stanza?’, asks David West at the start of his commentary on the ode. ‘The culprit’, he declares, ‘must be Horace.’ This answer accords with that to be found in other commentaries: ‘my scurrilous verses’, ‘my scandalous lines’, ‘my scurrilous iambics’, ‘my abusive iambics’, ‘miei ingiuriosi giambi’, ‘my libellous iambics’, ‘my libellous iambic verses’, ‘miei giambi ingiuriosi’. What, then, are these iambic verses? Some earlier scholars suggested that Horace is referring to various of his epodes, such as those addressed to Canidia ; but our knowledge of Canidia indicates that she would scarcely make plausible the accent on beauty in the first line of the ode. Most commentators, at least since the latter half of the nineteenth century, have believed that Horace is referring to some iambics which he had targeted at the ode's addressee but of which we now have no further knowledge: Kiessling and Heinze, for example, refer to ‘the satirical poems which Horace … has levelled at her’, while in the most recent commentary in 2012 Mayer says that Horace ‘assures an unnamed young woman that it rests with her to put an end to his vituperative attacks’.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0009838818000228
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Conjectures in Horace: Odes 1.16.8 and 1.35.25.David Kovacs - 2013 - Classical Quarterly 63 (1):339-345.
Comment Terminer Une Ode?P. H. Schrijvers - 1973 - Mnemosyne 26 (2):140-159.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

O Matre Pulchra Filia Pulchrior.E. H. Sturtevant - 1912 - The Classical Review 26 (04):119-122.
De Beatissima Virgine Maria Matre Dei.Josephus Leonissa - 1904 - Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 18:160.
The Fable of the Bees: proles sine matre?Béatrice Guion - 1st ed. 2015 - In Joaquim Braga & Edmundo Balsemão Pires (eds.), Bernard de Mandeville's Tropology of Paradoxes. Springer Verlag.
Following Logical Realism Where It Leads.Michaela McSweeney - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (1):117-139.
Logical Expressivism and Logical Relations.Lionel Shapiro - 2018 - In Ondřej Beran, Vojtěch Kolman & Ladislav Koreň (eds.), From rules to meanings. New essays on inferentialism. New York: Routledge. pp. 179-95.
On the Possibility of a Privileged Class of Logical Terms.Greg Ray - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):303 - 313.
Why Logical Revisabilism Is Wrong.Wei Yanxia - 2013 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 8 (3):507-517.
The T-Schema is Not a Logical Truth.R. T. Cook - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):231-239.
The Formal-Structural View Of Logical Consequence.Gila Sher - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (2):241-261.
What's So Logical About the “Logical” Axioms?J. H. Harris - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):159 - 171.


Added to PP index

Total views
28 ( #390,200 of 2,448,959 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #443,144 of 2,448,959 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes