O matre pvlchra: The logical iambist

Classical Quarterly:1-7 (forthcoming)
Anna Woodman
University of Alberta
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0009838818000228
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,812
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Conjectures in Horace: Odes 1.16.8 and 1.35.25.David Kovacs - 2013 - Classical Quarterly 63 (1):339-345.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

O Matre Pulchra Filia Pulchrior.E. H. Sturtevant - 1912 - The Classical Review 26 (04):119-122.
De Beatissima Virgine Maria Matre Dei.Josephus Leonissa - 1904 - Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 18:160.
The Fable of the Bees: proles sine matre?Béatrice Guion - 1st ed. 2015 - In Joaquim Braga & Edmundo Balsemão Pires (eds.), Bernard de Mandeville's Tropology of Paradoxes. Springer Verlag.
Logical Expressivism and Logical Relations.Lionel Shapiro - 2018 - In Ondřej Beran, Vojtěch Kolman & Ladislav Koreň (eds.), From Rules to Meanings: New Essays on Inferentialism. New York: Routledge. pp. 179-95.
On the Possibility of a Privileged Class of Logical Terms.Greg Ray - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):303 - 313.
Why Logical Revisabilism Is Wrong.Wei Yanxia - 2013 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 8 (3):507-517.
The T-Schema is Not a Logical Truth.R. T. Cook - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):231-239.
The Formal-Structural View Of Logical Consequence.Gila Sher - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (2):241-261.
What's So Logical About the “Logical” Axioms?J. H. Harris - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):159 - 171.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
1 ( #1,077,866 of 2,293,708 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #410,261 of 2,293,708 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature