Ruse's Darwinian meta-ethics: A critique [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):423-439 (1993)
Abstract
Michael Ruse, in Taking Darwin Seriously seeks to establish that taking Darwin seriously requires us to treat morality as subjective and naturalistic. I argue that, if morality is not objective, then we have no good reason for being moral if we can avoid detection and punishment. As a consequence, we will only continue to behave morally as long as we remain ignorant of Ruse''s theory, that is, as long as the cat is not let out of the bag. Ruse offers a number of arguments to show that his theory can overcome such problems. I argue that they all fail. Ruse also argues that he can offer a naturalistic account of ethics which steps around the naturalistic fallacy and avoids the confusion of reasons with causes. His principal argument for this view is an analogy between spiritualism and morality. I argue that this analogy fails.
Keywords Meta-ethics  Ruse  sociology  ethical subjectivism  ethical naturalism  naturalistic fallacy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00857688
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,341
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Emergence of Norms.Lanning Sowden & Edna Ullmann-Margalit - 1981 - Philosophical Quarterly 31 (122):82.
The Idea of a Social Science.Peter Winch - 1959 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 14 (2):247-248.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Darwinian Ethics and Error.R. Joyce - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (5):713-732.
Taking the 'Error' Out of Ruse's Error Theory.James A. Ryan - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):385-397.
Woolcock, Ruse, Again.J. A. Ryan - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (5):733-735.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ruse's Treatment of the Evidence for Evolution: A Reconsideration.Alexander Rosenberg - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:83 - 93.
A Defense of Darwinian Accounts of Morality.John Lemos - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):361-385.
Taking the 'Error' Out of Ruse's Error Theory.James A. Ryan - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):385-397.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
58 ( #107,097 of 2,266,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #82,676 of 2,266,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature