Suffering, Sympathy, and Security: Reassessing Rorty’s Contribution to Human Rights Theory

Res Publica 15 (1):53-66 (2009)

Abstract
This article reassess Rorty’s contribution to human rights theory. It addresses two key questions: (1) Does Rorty sustain his claim that there are no morally relevant transcultural facts? (2) Does Rorty’s proposed sentimental education offer an adequate response to contemporary human rights challenges? Although both questions are answered in the negative, it is argued here that Rorty’s focus on suffering, sympathy, and security, offer valuable resources to human rights theorists. The article concludes by considering the idea of a dual approach to human rights, combining Rorty’s emphasis on sentiment with an analysis of patterns of responsibility for the underfulfilment of human rights.
Keywords Rorty  Human rights theory  Environmental security  Sentimental education  Solidarity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-009-9083-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,686
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - The Personalist Forum 5 (2):149-152.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-04-20

Total views
70 ( #109,916 of 2,243,065 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #128,415 of 2,243,065 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature