Witness and Silence in Neuromarketing: Managing the Gap between Science and Its Application

Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (1):62-86 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Over the past decades commercial and academic market researchers have studied consumers through a range of different methods including surveys, focus groups, or interviews. More recently, some have turned to the growing field of neuroscience to understand consumers. Neuromarketing employs brain imaging, scanning, or other brain measurement technologies to capture consumers’ responses to marketing stimuli and to circumvent the “problem” of relying on consumers’ self-reports. This paper presents findings of an ethnographic study of neuromarketing research practices in one neuromarketing consultancy. Our access to the minutiae of commercial neuromarketing research provides important insights into how neuromarketers silence the neuromarketing test subject in their experiments and presentations and how they introduce the brain as an unimpeachable witness. This enables us conceptually to reconsider the role of witnesses in the achievement of scientific credibility, as prominently discussed in science and technology studies. Specifically, we probe the role witnesses and silences play in establishing and maintaining credibility in and for “commercial research laboratories.” We propose three themes that have wider relevance for STS researchers and require further attention when studying newly emerging research fields and practices that straddle science and its commercial application.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuromarketing: what is it, and is it a threat to privacy?Steve Matthews - 2014 - In Jens Clausen Neil Levy (ed.), Handbook on Neuroethics. Springer. pp. 1627-1645.
Neuromarketing – science and practice.Martina Hedda Sola - 2013 - Fip: Journal of Finance and Law 1 (1):25-34.
Braindance.Joshua M. Penrod - 2018 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 22 (1):76-97.
Neuroscience and neuroethics in the 21st century.M. J. Farah - 2011 - In Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 761--781.
Neuromania: On the Limits of Brain Science.Frances Anderson (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Brain reading.John-Dylan Haynes - 2012 - In Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees & Sarah J. L. Edwards (eds.), I know what you're thinking: brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 29.


Added to PP

17 (#873,973)

6 months
5 (#648,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?