What's at Stake in the Sociology of Technology? A Reply to Pinch and to Winner

Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (4):523-529 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,589

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Woolgar and Grint: A Preview. [REVIEW]Rob Kling - 1991 - Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (3):379-381.
Anti Anticonstructivism or Laying the Fears of a Langdon Winner to Rest.Mark Elam - 1994 - Science, Technology and Human Values 19 (1):101-106.
Do We Need a Critical Theory of Technology? Reply to Tyler Veak.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 25 (2):238-242.
Coke is It! Reply to Diamond.Thomas F. Gieryn - 1988 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 (1-2):78-81.
Reply to Richard Hull.Wiebe E. Bijker - 1994 - Science, Technology and Human Values 19 (2):245-246.
Reply to Mark Elam.Langdon Winner - 1994 - Science, Technology and Human Values 19 (1):107-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
21 (#1,182,677)

6 months
6 (#983,913)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word.Walter J. Ong - 1983 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 16 (4):270-271.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.R. Rorty - 1989 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 52 (3):566-566.
Turn, Turn, and Turn Again: The Woolgar Formula.Trevor Pinch - 1993 - Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (4):511-522.

Add more references