What constitutes consent when parents and daughters have different views about having the HPV vaccine: qualitative interviews with stakeholders

Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):466-471 (2011)

Authors
Mark Davies
Oklahoma City University
Abstract
Objective The UK Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine programme commenced in the autumn of 2008 for year 8 (age 12–13 years) schoolgirls. We examine whether the vaccine should be given when there is a difference of opinion between daughters and parents or guardians. Design Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Participants A sample of 25 stakeholders: 14 professionals involved in the development of the HPV vaccination programme and 11 professionals involved in its implementation. Results Overriding the parents' wishes was perceived as problematic and could damage the relationship between school and parents. A number of practical problems were raised in relation to establishing whether parents were genuinely against their daughter receiving the vaccine. Although many respondents recognised that the Gillick guidelines were relevant in establishing whether a girl could provide consent herself, they still felt that there were significant problems in establishing whether girls could be assessed as Gillick competent. In some areas school nurses had been advised not to give the vaccine in the absence of parental consent. None of the respondents suggested that a girl should be vaccinated against her consent even if her parents wanted her to have the vaccine. Conclusions While the Gillick guidelines provide a legal framework to help professionals make judgements about adolescents consenting to medical treatment, in practice there appears to be variable and confused interpretation of this guidance. Improved legal structures, management procedures and professional advice are needed to support those who are assessing competence and establishing consent to vaccinate adolescents in a school setting
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2010.038562
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,796
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The HPV Vaccine Controversy Where Are the Women? Where Are the Men? Where is the Money?Jennifer Caseldine-Bracht - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):99-112.
Public Health, Public Trust and Lobbying.Matthew K. Wynia - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):4 – 7.
Parental Consent and the Use of Dead Children's Bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-07-20

Total views
28 ( #292,292 of 2,244,033 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #1,041,488 of 2,244,033 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature