Topoi 30 (1):87-97 (2011)
True to the spirit of Topoi’s Untimely Reviews section, the present essay is a work of the counterfactual imagination. Suppose that Quine’s “Two Dogmas” had been written and published in the late 1990s rather than the early 1950s. What, in those circumstances, would philosophical commentary look like, especially against the marked developments in Quine’s philosophy in that same period? In short, how would Quine’s “Two Dogmas” stand up as a late 1990s paper rather than an early 1950s paper? Answering that question is my task here
|Keywords||Analyticity Carnap empiricism Essentialism Holism Meaning Pragmatism Phenomenalism Reductionism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth.Marian David - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:281 - 296.
„Dwa dogmaty” Quine'a jako krytyka logicznego empiryzmu.Artur Koterski - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (1).
Bernard Bolzano, Analyticity and the Aristotelian Model of Science.Willem R. de Jong - 2001 - Kant-Studien 92 (3):328-349.
Two Dogmas'–All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
'Two Dogmas'--All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633 - 648.
'Two Dogmas' -- All Bark and No Bite?Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633-648.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Fifty Years After.Herbert Schnädelbach - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):7-12.
Added to index2011-02-22
Total downloads75 ( #69,859 of 2,169,105 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,456 of 2,169,105 )
How can I increase my downloads?