Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (4):226-235 (2016)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
In this note, I discuss David Enoch's influential deliberative indispensability argument for metanormative realism, and contend that the argument fails. In doing so, I uncover an important disanalogy between explanatory indispensability arguments and deliberative indispensability arguments, one that explains how we could accept the former without accepting the latter.
|
| Keywords | inference to the best explanation explanatory indispensability moral realism indispensability arguments deliberation metanormative realism |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2016 |
| DOI | 10.1002/tht3.220 |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?Crispin Wright - 2004 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):167–212.
How Are Basic Belief-Forming Methods Justified?David Enoch & Joshua Schechter - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (3):547–579.
Entitlement: Epistemic Rights Without Epistemic Duties?Fred Dretske - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):591-606.
View all 13 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Against Deliberative Indispensability as an Independent Guide to What There Is.Brendan Cline - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (12):3235-3254.
Naturalizing Indispensability: A Rejoinder to ‘The Varieties of Indispensability Arguments’.Henri Galinon - 2016 - Synthese 193 (2).
If You Cannot Help Being Committed to It, Then It Exists: A Defence of Robust Normative Realism.Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco - 2012 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32 (4):823-841.
On the ‘Indispensable Explanatory Role’ of Mathematics.Juha Saatsi - 2016 - Mind 125 (500):1045-1070.
How Not to Enhance the Indispensability Argument.Russell Marcus - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):345-360.
The Varieties of Indispensability Arguments.Marco Panza & Andrea Sereni - 2016 - Synthese 193 (2):469-516.
Equivalent Explanations and Mathematical Realism. Reply to “Evidence, Explanation, and Enhanced Indispensability”.Andrea Sereni - 2016 - Synthese 193 (2):423-434.
Indispensability Without Platonism.Anne Newstead & James Franklin - 2012 - In Alexander Bird, Brian Ellis & Howard Sankey (eds.), Properties, Powers, and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 81-97.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-09-06
Total views
300 ( #23,286 of 2,325,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #20,699 of 2,325,142 )
2016-09-06
Total views
300 ( #23,286 of 2,325,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #20,699 of 2,325,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
