Rationality, sociology and the symmetry thesis

Abstract
Abstract This paper attempts to clarify the debate between those philosophers who hold that the development of science is governed by objective standards of rationality and those sociologists of science who deny this. In particular it focuses on the debate over the ?symmetry thesis?. Bloor and Barnes argue that a properly scientific approach to science itself demands that an investigator should seek the same general type of explanation for all decisions and actions by past scientists, quite independently of whether or not she or he happens to agree with those decisions or approve those actions as ?correct? or ?rational?. I try to improve on previous treatments of the ?rationalist? position (by Lakatos, Laudan, Newton?Smith and Brown) and clarify the exact asymmetries to which the ?rationalist? is, and is not, committed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698599008573370
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and Social Imagery.David Bloor - 1991 - University of Chicago Press.
The Value of a Fixed Methodology. [REVIEW]John Worrall - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):263-275.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Vacuity of Postmodernist Methodology.Nicholas Shackel - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):295-320.
Rethinking the “Strong Programme” in the Sociology of Knowledge.Adrian Haddock - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):19-40.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Curried Lakatos or, How Not to Spice Up the Norm-Ladenness Thesis.Stephen J. Wykstra - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:29 - 39.
Explanation and Rationality Naturalized.David Henderson - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):30-58.
Grünbaum's 'Defense' of the Symmetry Thesis.James H. Fetzer - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (3):173 - 187.
William Whewell: Problems of Induction Vs. Problems of Rationality.John Wettersten - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):716-742.
Invariance, Symmetry and Rationality.Michael Kruse - 2000 - Synthese 122 (3):337-357.
The Underdetermination of Theory by Data and the "Strong Programme" in the Sociology of Knowledge.Samir Okasha - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):283 – 297.
Truth, Rationality and the Sociology of Science.Richard C. Jennings - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):201-211.
Bad Arguments Against a Good Case (Laudan's Attack on the Strong Programme).Márta Fehér - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):233-238.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-02-01

Total downloads

19 ( #261,540 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #166,811 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums