Authors
Abstract
Evidence-Based Medicine is a relatively new movement that seeks to put clinical med- icine on a firmer scientific footing. I take it as uncontroversial that medical practice should be based on best evidence-the interesting questions concern the details. This paper tries to move towards a coherent and unified account of best evidence in medicine, by exploring in particular the EBM position on RCTs (randomized controlled trials)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/341855
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,491
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Understanding Scientific Reasoning.Ronald N. Giere - 1991 - Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Randomization and the Design of Experiments.Peter Urbach - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):256-273.
The Virtues of Randomization.David Papineau - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):437-450.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Meta-Analysis the Platinum Standard of Evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.
Robustness, Discordance, and Relevance.Jacob Stegenga - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):650-661.
Why There's No Cause to Randomize.John Worrall - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):451-488.

View all 84 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
202 ( #44,067 of 2,381,226 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #162,543 of 2,381,226 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes