COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH, DELIBERATION, AND INNOVATION

Episteme 11 (3):291-303 (2014)
Authors
K. Brad Wray
Aarhus University
Abstract
I evaluate the extent to which we could learn something about how we should be conducting collaborative research in science from the research on groupthink. I argue that Solomon has set us in the wrong direction, failing to recognize that the consensus in scientific specialties is not the result of deliberation. But the attention to the structure of problem-solving that has emerged in the groupthink research conducted by psychologists can help us see when deliberation could lead to problems for a research team. I argue that whenever we need to generate alternative solutions or proposals, groupthink is a genuine threat, and research teams would be wise to allow individuals opportunities to work alone. But the benefits of team work emerge when scientists seek to evaluate the various proposals generated, and determine a course of action. Then the group is less prone is groupthink, and the interaction of group members can be an epistemic asset.
Keywords groupthink  collaborative research
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/epi.2014.9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,954
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Who has Scientific Knowledge?K. Brad Wray - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (3):337 – 347.
Masking Disagreement Among Experts.John Beatty - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):52-67.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Values in Science: The Case of Scientific Collaboration.Kristina Rolin - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (2):157-177.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research.K. Brad Wray - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (1):150-168.
Groupthink Versus The Wisdom of Crowds.Miriam Solomon - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (Supplement):28-42.
Linking Groupthink to Unethical Behavior in Organizations.Ronald R. Sims - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (9):651 - 662.
Individual-Centered Collaborative Research.Nancy Stanlick - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (1):85-110.
Collaborative Healthcare Research: Some Ethical Considerations.Mohsin Raza - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):177-186.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-07-15

Total downloads
18 ( #340,324 of 2,293,884 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #411,560 of 2,293,884 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature