Rethinking language faculty. Has language evolved for other than language related reasons?

Theoria Et Historia Scientiarum 9:201-215 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Hauser Marc, D. Chomsky, Noam Fitch & W. Tecumseh - 2002 - Science 298 (22):1569-1579.
Selectionist Approaches in Evolutionary Linguistics: An Epistemological Analysis.Nathalie Gontier - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):67 - 95.
What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language?: Reply to Collins.Barry C. Smith - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75.
Language evolution: Body of evidence?Chen Yu & Dana H. Ballard - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):148-149.
Evolving the Linguistic Mind.Keith Frankish - 2010 - Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 9:206-214.
The limits of language.Stephen David Ross - 1994 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Why possibly language evolved.Peter J. Richerson & Robert Boyd - unknown
Tegn som Språk.Sissel Redse Jørgensen & Rani Lill Anjum (eds.) - 2006 - Gyldendal Akademisk.
Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche.Steven Pinker - manuscript
Faculty disputes.John Collins - 2004 - Mind and Language 19 (5):503-33.
Ignorance of Language.Michael Devitt - 2006 - Oxford, GB: Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Language use, not language, is what develops in childhood and adolescence.Derek Bickerton - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):280-281.
The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky).Ray Jackendoff - 2005 - Cognition 97 (2):211-225.
The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky).Steven Pinker - 2005 - Cognition 97 (2):211-225.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
3 (#1,650,745)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references