Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1010-1011 (2001)

The authors O'Regan & Noë (O&N) have ignored the case for the visual field as being non-epistemic evidence internal to the brain, having no pictorial similarity to the external input, and being material in ontological status. They are also not aware of the case for the evolutionary advantage of learning as the perceptual refashioning of such non-epistemic sensory evidence via motivated feedback in sensorimotor activity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x01630115
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #366,364 of 2,499,680 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,680 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes