(Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G. E. Moore and John McDowell

Authors
Crispin Wright
University of Stirling
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00205.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,134
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Skeptic and the Dogmatist.James Pryor - 2000 - Noûs 34 (4):517–549.
Epistemic Operators.Fred I. Dretske - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (24):1007-1023.
XI—Perception, Vision and Causation.Paul Snowdon - 1981 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81 (1):175-192.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
Problems for Dogmatism.Roger White - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (3):525-557.
McDowell and the New Evil Genius.Ram Neta & Duncan Pritchard - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):381–396.
Varieties of Inference?Anna‐Sara Malmgren - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):221-254.

View all 65 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
326 ( #13,488 of 2,308,309 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #35,410 of 2,308,309 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature