Philosophical Psychology 35 (3):350-385 (2022)

Authors
Thomas Pölzler
University of Graz
Abstract
Moral abolitionists claim that morality ought to be abolished. According to one of their most prominent arguments, this is because making moral judgments renders people significantly less tolerant toward anyone who holds divergent views. In this paper we investigate the hypothesis that morality’s tolerance-decreasing effect only occurs if people are realists about moral issues, i.e., they interpret these issues as objectively grounded. We found support for this hypothesis (Studies 1 and 2). Yet, it also turned out that the intolerance associated with realism is mediated by moral conviction and perceived consensus. People tend to feel more strongly about those moral issues they ground objectively and, in doing so, are more prone to display the vice of moral smugness toward those who disagree with them. The remedy for this that has been recommended is humility which we found (Study 3) is indeed related to reduced intolerance, in part by predicting a reduction in realism, but also in part through a direct connection to intolerance. These results put pressure on abolitionists’ “argument from intolerance.”
Keywords moral abolitionism  intolerance  objectivism  realism  conviction  humility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2021.1983160
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Realism: A Defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Ethical Intuitionism.Michael Huemer - 2005 - Palgrave Macmillan.
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.Fred Feldman & J. L. Mackie - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):134.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Links Between Religion and Intolerance.Yossi Nehushtan - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (1):91-132.
Intolerance and Argument Expression.Ben Cross - 2019 - Social Theory and Practice 45 (3):329-352.
Intolerantie, onverschilligheid en eerbied.Joris L. Van Damme - 2004 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 66 (2):227-253.
Book Review: Sam Harris' The Moral Landscape. [REVIEW]Russell Blackford - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (2):53-62.
An Argument for Intolerance.J. F. Catherwood - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):427-431.
To Be Thoughtful of the Other.Veress Karoly - 2008 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 7 (19):94-106.
The Authoritarian Dynamic.Karen Stenner - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Nonassertive Moral Abolitionism.Jason Dockstader - 2019 - Metaphilosophy 50 (4):481-502.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-01-08

Total views
112 ( #107,248 of 2,533,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #14,108 of 2,533,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes