Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):169-187 (2011)

Authors
Anthony Wrigley
Keele University
Abstract
The standard by which we apply decision-making for those unable to do so for themselves is an important practical ethical issue with substantial implications for the treatment and welfare of such individuals. The approach to proxy or surrogate decision-making based upon substituted judgement is often seen as the ideal standard to aim for but suffers from a need to provide a clear account of how to determine the validity of the proxy's judgements. Proponents have responded to this demand by providing the truth-conditions for the substituted judgement in terms of counterfactual reasoning using a possible worlds semantics. In this paper, I show how these underpinnings fail to support the substituted judgement approach as a reasonable standard for decision-making. Firstly, I show how this counterfactual element has been poorly interpreted. I then explain how various accounts have failed to reflect problems and limitations associated with providing an interpretation of their truth-conditions using counterfactuals. Finally, I argue that, even when we attend to the initial problems of providing a counterfactual analysis, it still deeply problematic as a means of determining the validity of substituted judgements for two main reasons. Firstly, making determinate judgements as to the truth-value of these judgements will often not be possible and, secondly, there is a strong requirement when interpreting many counterfactual claims to charitably accede to their being true. I conclude that substituted judgements, as interpreted through counterfactual reasoning and possible worlds semantics, do not therefore provide an adequate standard for surrogate decision-making.
Keywords Proxy Decision-Making  Counterfactuals  Substituted Judgements
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2011.00516.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,217
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Authority and Proxy Decision-Making.Anthony Wrigley - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):631-647.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Dilemma for the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation.S. Barker - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):62 – 77.
Social Judgement Theory and Medical Judgement.Robert S. Wigton - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):175 – 190.
Proxy Consent and Counterfactuals.Yujin Nagasawa - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (1):16–24.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
48 ( #192,992 of 2,324,940 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #303,931 of 2,324,940 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes