NanoEthics 14 (2):135-153 (2020)
Authors | |
Abstract |
This paper presents scientists’ understanding of their roles in society and corresponding responsibilities. It discusses the researchers’ perspective against the background of the contemporary literature on scientific responsibility in the social sciences and philosophy and proposes a heuristic that improves the understanding of the complexity of scientific responsibility. The study is based on qualitative interviews with senior scientists. The presented results show what researchers themselves see as their responsibilities, how they assume them, and what challenges they perceive with respect to their responsibilities. Regarding the latter, the interviewed researchers highlight those aspects of responsibility that go beyond the expertise of their professional role, and thus cannot be carried by scientists alone. For example, scientists alone cannot determine the general direction science takes, or the useful application of their research. The interviewed researchers describe those challenges as responsibilities that must be shared across different societal groups. In the theoretical literature, responsibility has been described as a relation between an actor, the action for which someone is responsible, and the normative framework against which someone is responsible. We will draw on this concept of “relational responsibility” to identify the various actors, normative frameworks, and actions relevant to scientific responsibility. This will serve as a heuristic tool to help identify the entanglement of responsibilities spread across several societal groups.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11569-020-00365-5 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Value-Free Science: Ideals and Illusions?Harold Kincaid, John Dupre & Alison Wylie (eds.) - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations.Robert K. Merton & Norman Storer - 1974 - Science and Society 38 (2):228-231.
View all 31 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Responsible Innovation Definitions, Practices, and Motivations from Nanotechnology Researchers in Food and Agriculture.Adam E. Kokotovich, Jennifer Kuzma, Christopher L. Cummings & Khara Grieger - 2021 - NanoEthics 15 (3):229-243.
Similar books and articles
‘We Have to Go Where the Money Is’—Dilemmas in the Role of Nutrition Scientists: An Interview Study. [REVIEW]Anna Paldam Folker, Lotte Holm & Peter Sandøe - 2009 - Minerva 47 (2):217-236.
Text-Based Plagiarism in Scientific Writing: What Chinese Supervisors Think About Copying and How to Reduce It in Students’ Writing.Yongyan Li - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):569-583.
Ten Standard Objections to Qualitative Research Interviews.Steinar Kvale - 1994 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 25 (2):147-173.
Leaping “Out of the Doubt”—Nutrition Advice: Values at Stake in Communicating Scientific Uncertainty to the Public.Anna Paldam Folker & Peter Sandøe - 2008 - Health Care Analysis 16 (2):176-191.
Everyday Scientific Imagination: A Qualitative Study of the Uses, Norms, and Pedagogy of Imagination in Science.Michael T. Stuart - 2019 - Science & Education 28 (6-7):711-730.
Researching Education Policy, Public Policy, and Policymakers: Qualitative Methods and Ethical Issues.Dan Gibton - 2015 - Routledge.
A Phenomenological Perspective On Some Phenomenographic Results On Learning.Amedeo Giorgi - 1999 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 30 (2):68-93.
Thinking Like a Scientist: Innateness as a Case Study.Joshua Knobe & Richard Samuels - 2013 - Cognition 126 (1):72-86.
Co-Responsibility for Research Integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
When Do Board and Management Resources Complement Each Other? A Study of Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility.Jeremy Galbreath - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 136 (2):281-292.
Sind Wissenschaftstreibende Für Die Verwertung Ihrer Forschungsergebnisse Verantwortlich?Otto Neumaier - 2001 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):19-33.
Scientists' Thoughts on Scientific Models.Daniela M. Bailer-Jones - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (3):275-301.
Is the Qualitative Research Interview an Acceptable Medium for Research with Palliative Care Patients and Carers?Marjolein Gysels, Cathy Shipman & Irene J. Higginson - 2008 - BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):7-.
1.5 Scientific Knowledge Leads to Moral Responsibilities–Case Study Synthetic Biology.Anna Deplazes-Zemp & Sebastian Leidel - forthcoming - Common Knowledge: The Challenge of Transdisciplinarity.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-03-31
Total views
11 ( #856,162 of 2,520,747 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,747 )
2020-03-31
Total views
11 ( #856,162 of 2,520,747 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,747 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads