Why Sibley is Not a Generalist After All

British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14 (2010)
Abstract
In his influential paper, ‘General Criteria and Reasons in Aesthetics’, Frank Sibley outlines what is taken to be a generalist view (shared with Beardsley) such that there are general reasons for aesthetic judgement, and his account of the behaviour of such reasons, which differs from Beardsley's. In this paper my aim is to illuminate Sibley's position by employing a distinction that has arisen in meta-ethics in response to recent work by Jonathan Dancy in particular. Contemporary research involves two related yet distinct debates: (i) that between the particularist and the generalist on the status of moral principles; and (ii) that between holists and atomists on the nature of reasons. This division of labour has no correlate within the aesthetic particularism–generalism debate, and I will show how the ideas developed in relation to meta-ethics illuminate a difficulty with Sibley's view. I argue that we should understand Sibley as subscribing to both particularism and a version of holism about aesthetic reasons
Keywords Sibley  Particularism  Holism  Dancy  Aesthetic concepts  Aesthetic principles  Default reasons
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayp037
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,786
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Why Ethics and Aesthetics Are Practically the Same.Aaron Ridley - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly:pqv069.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
The Riddle of Aesthetic Principles.Vojko Strahovnik - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):189-208.
Ethics Without Reasons?Roger Crisp - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):40-49.
Aesthetic Principles.Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):114-125.
Irreversible Generalism: A Reply to Dickie.Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):289-295.
Reading Sibley.George Dickie - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):408-412.
Why Sibley Is (Probably) Not a Particularist After All.C. Kirwin - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):201-212.
Added to PP index
2009-10-25

Total downloads
75 ( #79,377 of 2,231,532 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #80,346 of 2,231,532 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature