British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14 (2010)

Authors
Anna Bergqvist
Manchester Metropolitan University
Abstract
In his influential paper, ‘General Criteria and Reasons in Aesthetics’, Frank Sibley outlines what is taken to be a generalist view (shared with Beardsley) such that there are general reasons for aesthetic judgement, and his account of the behaviour of such reasons, which differs from Beardsley's. In this paper my aim is to illuminate Sibley's position by employing a distinction that has arisen in meta-ethics in response to recent work by Jonathan Dancy in particular. Contemporary research involves two related yet distinct debates: (i) that between the particularist and the generalist on the status of moral principles; and (ii) that between holists and atomists on the nature of reasons. This division of labour has no correlate within the aesthetic particularism–generalism debate, and I will show how the ideas developed in relation to meta-ethics illuminate a difficulty with Sibley's view. I argue that we should understand Sibley as subscribing to both particularism and a version of holism about aesthetic reasons
Keywords Sibley  Particularism  Holism  Dancy  Aesthetic concepts  Aesthetic principles  Default reasons
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayp037
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Aesthetic Reasons and the Demands They (Do Not) Make.Daniel Whiting - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2):407-427.
Art Criticism as Practical Reasoning.Anthony Cross - 2017 - British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (3):299-317.
The Limits of Aesthetic Empiricism.Fabian Dorsch - 2014 - In Gregory Currie, Matthew Kieran, Aaron Meskin & Jon Robson (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind. Oxford University Press. pp. 75-100.
Cavendish’s Aesthetic Realism.Daniel Whiting - forthcoming - Philosophers' Imprint.
Why Ethics and Aesthetics Are Practically the Same.Aaron Ridley - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly:pqv069.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
The Riddle of Aesthetic Principles.Vojko Strahovnik - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):189-208.
Ethics Without Reasons?Roger Crisp - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):40-49.
Aesthetic Principles.Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):114-125.
Irreversible Generalism: A Reply to Dickie.Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):289-295.
Reading Sibley.George Dickie - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):408-412.
Why Sibley Is (Probably) Not a Particularist After All.C. Kirwin - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):201-212.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-10-25

Total views
105 ( #114,317 of 2,533,691 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #199,170 of 2,533,691 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes