Synthese 169 (1):91 - 124 (2009)
We address the question of whether it is possible to operate a time machine by manipulating matter and energy so as to manufacture closed timelike curves. This question has received a great deal of attention in the physics literature, with attempts to prove no- go theorems based on classical general relativity and various hybrid theories serving as steps along the way towards quantum gravity. Despite the effort put into these no-go theorems, there is no widely accepted definition of a time machine. We explain the conundrum that must be faced in providing a satisfactory definition and propose a resolution. Roughly, we require that all extensions of the time machine region contain closed timelike curves; the actions of the time machine operator are then sufficiently "potent" to guarantee that closed timelike curves appear. We then review no-go theorems based on classical general relativity, semi-classical quantum gravity, quantum field theory on curved spacetime, and Euclidean quantum gravity. Our verdict on the question of our title is that no result of sufficient generality to underwrite a confident "yes" has been proven. Our review of the no-go results does, however, highlight several foundational problems at the intersection of general relativity and quantum physics that lend substance to the search for an answer
|Keywords||General relativity Time travel Time machines QFT on curved spacetime Causality Closed timelike curves|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
On the Existence of “Time Machines” in General Relativity.John Byron Manchak - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):1020-1026.
Presentism and Black Holes.Geurt Sengers - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (1):1-15.
Similar books and articles
Time Travel and Time Machines.Chris Smeenk & Christian Wuthrich - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 577-630.
The Arguments of Time.Jeremy Butterfield (ed.) - 1999 - Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Quantum Concepts in Space and Time.Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.) - 1986 - New York ;Oxford University Press.
Twins' Paradox and Closed Timelike Curves: The Role of Proper Time and the Presentist View on Spacetime. [REVIEW]Cord Friebe - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):313-326.
Pre-Socratic Quantum Gravity.Belot Gordon & Earman John - 2001 - In Craig Callender & Nick Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge University Press. pp. 213--55.
Whatever is Never and Nowhere is Not: Space, Time, and Ontology in Classical and Quantum Gravity.Gordon Scott Belot - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Spacetime and the Philosophical Challenge of Quantum Gravity.Jeremy Butterfield & Chris Isham - 2001 - In Physics Meets Philosophy at the Panck Scale. Cambridge University Press.
Presentism and Quantum Gravity.Bradley Monton - 2006 - In Dennis Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime.
On the Emergence of Time in Quantum Gravity.Jeremy Butterfield & Chris Isham - 1999 - In The Arguments of Time. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press. pp. 111--168.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads407 ( #6,082 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #30,357 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?