In the first decades of the 20th century politics, economy and the emerging social sciences were not the only realms engaged in understanding social questions and organizing society by means of statistical inquiries and probability calculation. At the same time, social methods and collective conditions of scientific rationality were emerging in contemporary epistemological writings. However, adopting social conditions of scientific reasoning and activity in this period does not mean a renunciation of exact scientific methods. On the contrary, the emergence of social foundations for scientific activity and reasoning can be understood as a scientific conception aiming at objectivity. This paper traces the emergence of collective conceptions and methods in Edgar Zilsel’s statistical and inductive epistemology that established the production of knowledge as an infinite and procedural enterprise.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Introduction to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on "Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers".Kay Mathiesen - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (3):209 – 216.
Collective Memory, Group Minds, and the Extended Mind Thesis.Robert A. Wilson - 2005 - Cognitive Processing 6 (4).
Rethinking Objectivity in Social Science.E. Montuschi - 2004 - Social Epistemology 18 (2-3):109-122.
The Material Memory of History: Edgar Zilsel's Epistemology of Historiography. [REVIEW]Monika Wulz - 2012 - Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):91-105.
Added to index2009-07-02
Total downloads36 ( #141,326 of 2,158,901 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #353,783 of 2,158,901 )
How can I increase my downloads?