Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (6):690-719 (2017)
AbstractThis essay contends that individual liberty, understood as the permissibility of making choices about one’s own health care in support of one’s own good and the good of one’s family utilizing private resources, is central to the moral foundations of a health care system. Such individual freedoms are important not only because they often support more efficient and effective health care services, but because they permit individuals to fulfill important moral duties. A comparative study of the health care systems in Hong Kong and mainland China is utilized to illustrate the conceptual and moral concerns at stake. Both regions have implemented two-tier health care systems with a public tier of basic health care services together with a second tier of privately purchased health care. As we document, Hong Kong permits patients and doctors significantly greater opportunities to choose private health care of typically higher medical quality than their mainland counterparts. As a result, individuals are able to obtain higher quality health care while also fulfilling important moral duties for themselves and their families. In this sense, Hong Kong’s health care system is morally superior to mainland China’s. In each case, Confucianism’s concerns regarding equality are partly satisfied through the provision of public health care services on the basic tier, while appropriate use of private resources in support of oneself and one’s family is permissibly exercised on the private tier. Although it is true that inequalities in health care access and outcome are inevitable within a system that permits such individual freedoms, we argue that such inequalities are morally justifiable in terms of Confucian ethical thought.
Similar books and articles
Reconstructionist Confucianism and Health Care: An Asian Moral Account of Health Care Resource Allocation.Ruiping Fan - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):675 – 682.
Does It Really Care? The Harvard Report on Health Care Reform for Hong Kong.Julia Tao Lai Po-wah - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):571 – 590.
Health Care Reform and Societal Values.Hong Fung, Nancy Tse & E. K. Yeoh - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):638 – 652.
Free Choice, Equity, and Care: The Moral Foundations of Health Care.Chan Ho-mun - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):624 – 637.
Limiting Solidarity in the Netherlands: A Two-Tier System on the Way.Ruud H. J. Ter Meulen - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6).
Towards a Two Tier Health System in the Netherlands: How to Put Theory Into Practice.Gert van der Wilt - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):617-630.
The Social Determinants of Health, Care Ethics and Just Health Care.Daniel Engster - 2014 - Contemporary Political Theory 13 (2):149-167.
Limiting Solidarity in the Netherlands: A Two-Tier System on the Way.Ruud Ter Meulen - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):607-616.
Improving the Population's Health: The Affordable Care Act and the Importance of Integration.Lorian E. Hardcastle, Katherine L. Record, Peter D. Jacobson & Lawrence O. Gostin - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):317-327.
Beyond Health Outcomes: The Benefits of Health Care. [REVIEW]Gavin Mooney - 1998 - Health Care Analysis 6 (2):99-105.
Freedom and Moral Diversity: The Moral Failures of Health Care in the Welfare State.H. Tristram Engelhardt - 1997 - Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (2):180.
Tiers Without Tears: The Ethics of a Two-Tiered Health Care System.Benjamin J. Krohmal & Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2009 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Priorities in the Israeli Health Care System.Frida Simonstein - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):341-347.
Freedom and Moral Diversity: The Moral Failures of Health Care in the Welfare State: H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.H. Tristram Engelhardt - 1997 - Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (2):180-196.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Policy, Ethics, and Regulation.Huw Roberts, Josh Cowls, Jessica Morley, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Vincent Wang & Luciano Floridi - 2021 - AI and Society 36 (1):59–77.
Truth, Progress, and Regress in Bioethics.Victor Saenz - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (6):615-633.
References found in this work
Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice.Norman Daniels - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.