Epistemological Issues Raised by a Structuralist Archaeology

In Ian Hodder (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 39-46 (1982)

Authors
Alison Wylie
University of British Columbia
Abstract
Insofar as the material residues of interest to archaeologists are cultural and, as such, have specifically symbolic significance, it is argued that archaeology must employ some form of structuralist analysis (i.e. as specifically concerned with this aspect of the material). Wylie examines the prevalent notion that such analysis is inevitably 'unscientific' because it deals with a dimension of material culture which is inaccessible of any direct, empirical investigation, and argues that this rests on an entrenched misconception of science; it assumes that scientific enquiry must be restricted to observables. It is clear, as realist critics of this view have argued, that scientific (explanatory) understanding depends fundamentally on theoretical extensions beyond observables; extensions which bring into view underlying and inaccessible causal structures or mechanisms responsible for the mani- fest phenomena through a procedure of analogical model construc- tion. In consideration of realist models of these procedures and of the potential of linguistic modes of analysis for archaeology, it is pro- posed that archaeologists might (and, in fact, often do) effectively grasp the symbolic, structural order of surviving material culture through analysis governed by a rigorous and controlled use of ethno- graphic analogy. It is claimed, moreover, that the archaeological record can provide empirical bases for evaluating these theoretical constructs if a procedure of recursive and systematic testing is adopted in research, but the standard hypothetico-deductive model is seriously flawed as an account of an ideal for this procedure. Glassie's analysis of Middle Virginian folk housing is an example of research along these lines which illustrates the potential for a rigorous structuralist alternative.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,796
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Positivism and the New Archaeology.Margaret Alison Wylie - 1982 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton
Structuralist Perspective1.Bernhard Lauth - 1996 - In Wolfgang Balzer & Carlos Ulises Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 6--115.
A Rigorous Set Theoretical Foundation of the Structuralist Approach.H. Peter - 1996 - In Wolfgang Balzer & Carlos Ulises Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 6--233.
Putting Shakertown Back Together: Critical Theory in Archaeology.Alison Wylie - 1985 - Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4 (2):133-147.
Evidence and Ethics in Medicine.John Worrall - 2008 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51 (3):418-431.
Epistemological Issues Raised by Research on Climate Change.Paolo Vineis, Aneire Khan & Flavio D'Abramo - 2011 - In Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-27

Total views
20 ( #410,033 of 2,244,032 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #398,873 of 2,244,032 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature