Classifying, Constructing, and Identifying Life: Standards as Transformations of “The Biological” [Book Review]

Science, Technology, and Human Values 38 (5):701-722 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Recent accounts of “the biological” emphasize its thoroughgoing transformation. Accounts of biomedicalization, biotechnology, biopower, biocapital, and bioeconomy tend to agree that twentieth- and twenty-first-century life sciences transform the object of biology, the biological. Amidst so much transformation, we explore attempts to stabilize the biological through standards. We ask: how do standards handle the biological in transformation? Based on ethnographic research, the article discusses three contemporary postgenomic standards that classify, construct, or identify biological forms: the Barcoding of Life Initiative, the BioBricks Assembly Standard, and the Proteomics Standards Initiative. We rely on recent critical analyses of standardization to suggest that any attempt to attribute a fixed property to the biological actually multiplies dependencies between values, materials, and human and nonhuman agents. We highlight ways in which these biological standards cross-validate life forms with forms of life such as publics, infrastructures, and forms of disciplinary compromise. Attempts to standardize the biological, we suggest, offer a good way to see how a life form is always also a form of life.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The biological and philosophical definitions of life.M. Jeuken - 1975 - Acta Biotheoretica 24 (1-2):14-21.
Biodiversity Realism: Preserving the tree of life.Christopher Lean - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):1083-1103.
Tractarian Form as the Precursor to Forms of Life.Chon Tejedor - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4:83-109.
What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism.Marc Ereshefsky - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
Biological Individuals.Robert A. Wilson & Matthew J. Barker - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1 (1).
Life, Science, and Biopower.Richard Tutton & Sujatha Raman - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (5):711-734.
Norms for emotions: Biological functions and representational contents.Matteo Mameli - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (1):101-121.
A Functional Naturalism.Anthony Nguyen - 2021 - Synthese 198 (1):295-313.
Proper activity, preference, and the meaning of life.Lucas J. Mix - 2014 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 6 (20150505).
Biological Information, Causality and Specificity - an Intimate Relationship.Karola Stotz & Paul E. Griffiths - 2017 - In Sara Imari Walker, Paul Davies & George Ellis (eds.), From Matter to Life: Information and Causality. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 366-390.
Life and the scientific concept of life.C. Hertogh - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (2).


Added to PP

3 (#1,313,661)

6 months
1 (#447,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?