Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433 (2013)
Abstract
The prospective robots in healthcare intended to be included within the conclave of the nurse-patient relationship—what I refer to as care robots—require rigorous ethical reflection to ensure their design and introduction do not impede the promotion of values and the dignity of patients at such a vulnerable and sensitive time in their lives. The ethical evaluation of care robots requires insight into the values at stake in the healthcare tradition. What’s more, given the stage of their development and lack of standards provided by the International Organization for Standardization to guide their development, ethics ought to be included into the design process of such robots. The manner in which this may be accomplished, as presented here, uses the blueprint of the Value-sensitive design approach as a means for creating a framework tailored to care contexts. Using care values as the foundational values to be integrated into a technology and using the elements in care, from the care ethics perspective, as the normative criteria, the resulting approach may be referred to as care centered value-sensitive design. The framework proposed here allows for the ethical evaluation of care robots both retrospectively and prospectively. By evaluating care robots in this way, we may ultimately ask what kind of care we, as a society, want to provide in the future
Keywords Value-sensitive design  Care robots  Care ethics  Ethics and technology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,898
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose.Joan Tronto - 2010 - Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2):158-171.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Should We Welcome Robot Teachers?Amanda J. C. Sharkey - 2016 - Ethics and Information Technology 18 (4):283-297.
The Ethics of Robotic Caregivers.Amitai Etzioni & Oren Etzioni - 2017 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18 (2):174-190.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design.Aimee van Wynsberghe - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.
Relational Autonomy as an Essential Component of Patient-Centered Care.Carolyn Ells, Matthew R. Hunt & Jane Chambers-Evans - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):79-101.
The Role of Well‐Being.Joseph Raz - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):269–294.
Care Ethics and Virtue Ethics.Raja Halwani - 2003 - Hypatia 18 (3):161-192.
The Importance of What They Care About.Matthew Noah Smith - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):297-314.
Beyond Care?Nicki Hedge & Alison Mackenzie - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (2):192-206.
Ethical Challenges in Critical Care Medicine: A Chinese Perspective.Yali Cong - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (6):581 – 600.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-01-03

Total downloads
110 ( #57,313 of 2,293,852 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #22,413 of 2,293,852 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature