Cognitive Science 40 (8):2081-2094 (2016)
AbstractSemantic categories in the world's languages often reflect a historical process of chaining: A name for one referent is extended to a conceptually related referent, and from there on to other referents, producing a chain of exemplars that all bear the same name. The beginning and end points of such a chain might in principle be rather dissimilar. There is also evidence supporting a contrasting picture: Languages tend to support efficient, informative communication, often through semantic categories in which all exemplars are similar. Here, we explore this tension through computational analyses of existing cross-language naming and sorting data from the domain of household containers. We find formal evidence for historical semantic chaining, and evidence that systems of categories in this domain nonetheless support near-optimally efficient communication. Our results demonstrate that semantic chaining is compatible with efficient communication, and they suggest that chaining may be constrained by the functional need for efficient communication.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Women, Fire and Dangerous Thing: What Catergories Reveal About the Mind.George Lakoff (ed.) - 1987 - University of Chicago Press.
Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution.Brent Berlin & Paul Kay - 1991 - Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind.George Lakoff - 1987 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 22 (4):299-302.
Principles of Representation: Why You Can't Represent the Same Concept Twice.Louise Connell & Dermot Lynott - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (3):390-406.
Citations of this work
What Are Natural Concepts? A Design Perspective.Igor Douven & Peter Gärdenfors - 2019 - Mind and Language (3):313-334.
Conceptual Relations Predict Colexification Across Languages.Yang Xu, Khang Duong, Barbara C. Malt, Serena Jiang & Mahesh Srinivasan - 2020 - Cognition 201:104280.
An Ideal Disorder? Autism as a Psychiatric Kind.Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2017 - Philosophical Explorations 20 (2):175-190.
Indefinite Pronouns Optimize the Simplicity/Informativeness Trade‐Off.Milica Denić, Shane Steinert-Threlkeld & Jakub Szymanik - 2022 - Cognitive Science 46 (5):e13142.
Similar books and articles
Cognitive Science and the Problem of Semantic Content.Kenneth M. Sayre - 1987 - Synthese 70 (February):247-69.
Semantic Minimalism and the “Miracle of Communication”.Endre Begby - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):957-973.
Does Speaker's Reference Have Semantic Relevance?David Lumsden - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (1):15 - 21.
Talking About What Does Not Exist: A Semantics of Radical Reference Failure.Anne Jude Hunt - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Virginia
The Communication Desideratum and Theories of Indexical Reference.Jonas Åkerman - 2015 - Mind and Language 30 (4):474–499.
Brandom on Communication.Kevin Scharp - forthcoming - In Jason Hannon & Robert Rutland (eds.), Philosophical Profiles in the Theory of Communication. McGill-Queen's University Press.
Semantiek en de zin van het leven Semantics and the Meaning of Life.Filip Buekens - 1998 - Bijdragen 59 (3):315-337.
Using Statistics for Cross-Linguistic Semantics: A Quantitative Investigation of the Typology of Colour Naming Systems.G. Jager - 2012 - Journal of Semantics 29 (4):521-544.
Semantic Normativity and Semantic Causality.Lei Zhong - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (3):626-645.