Philosophical Perspectives 11 (s11):43-82 (1997)
Consider the following sentence schemata: (1) The proposition that P is F; (2) The property of being Q is F; (3) The relation of being R is F, where `P' is a schematic letter for a sentence, `Q' and `F' are schematic letters for a nonrelational predicate, and `R' is a schematic letter for a relational predicate. For example, if we substitute `Snow is white' for `P', `famous' for `F' in (1), `round' for `Q', `instantiated' for `F' in (2), `a father of' for `R', and `asymmetric' for `F' in (3), then we obtain the following particular sentences.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Inexpressible Properties and Grelling's Antinomy.Benjamin Schnieder - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (3):369 - 385.
Inexpressible Properties and Grelling’s Antinomy.Benjamin Schnieder - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (3):369-385.
Similar books and articles
The Modal Object Calculus and its Interpretation.Edward N. Zalta - 1997 - In M. de Rijke (ed.), Advances in Intensional Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 249--279.
No Problem for Aristotle's Subject and Predicate.Guy Politzer - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):298-299.
Expression, Truth, Predication, and Context: Two Perspectives.James Higginbotham - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (4):473 – 494.
Intensional Contexts and Intensional Entities.Eric Russert Kraemer - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (1):65 - 66.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #188,594 of 2,146,915 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,062 of 2,146,915 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.