Possible objects

Abstract

Deep theorizing about possibility requires theorizing about possible objects. One popular approach regards the notion of a possible object as intertwined with the notion of a possible world. There are two widely discussed types of theory concerning the nature of possible worlds: actualist representationism and possibilist realism. They support two opposing views about possible objects. Examination of the ways in which they do so reveals difficulties on both sides. There is another popular approach, which has been influenced by the philosophy of Alexius Meinong. The Meinongian approach is relevant to theorizing about possible objects because it attempts to construct a general theory of objects other than ordinary concrete existing objects. Independently of the debate about the nature of possible worlds or about Meinongianism, it is not always as straightforward as it may at first appear to determine whether putative possible objects are indeed possible. Another category of object similar to that of a possible object is the category of a fictional object. Although initially attractive, the idea that fictional objects are possible objects should not be accepted blindly. An important instance of theoretical usefulness of possible objects is their central role in the validation of two controversial theorems of a simple quantified modal logic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
Thing and object.Kristie Miller - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89.
Meinong, Alexius; I: Meinongian Semantics.William J. Rapaport - 1991 - In Hans Burkhardt & Barry Smith (eds.), Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology. Philosophia Verlag. pp. 516-519.
A modal argument against vague objects.Joseph G. Moore - 2008 - Philosophers' Imprint 8:1-17.
Object Perception: Vision and Audition.Casey O’Callaghan - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):803-829.
On the objects and interpretants of signs: Comments on T. L. short's.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
107 (#118,146)

6 months
1 (#454,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Takashi Yagisawa
California State University, Northridge

Citations of this work

Hyperintensionality and Normativity.Federico L. G. Faroldi - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Path Integrals and Holism.Marco Forgione - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (8):799-827.
The Ideal Observer Theory and Motivational Internalism.Daniel Rönnedal - 2015 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):79-98.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references