Synthese 165 (2):295 - 315 (2008)

Tomoyuki Yamada
Hokkaido University
In this paper, illocutionary acts of commanding will be differentiated from perlocutionary acts that affect preferences of addressees in a new dynamic logic which combines the preference upgrade introduced in DEUL (dynamic epistemic upgrade logic) by van Benthem and Liu with the deontic update introduced in ECL II (eliminative command logic II) by Yamada. The resulting logic will incorporate J. L. Austin’s distinction between illocutionary acts as acts having mere conventional effects and perlocutionary acts as acts having real effects upon attitudes and actions of agents, and help us understand why saying so can make it so in explicit performative utterances. We will also discuss how acts of commanding give rise to so-called “deontic dilemmas” and how we can accommodate most deontic dilemmas without triggering so-called “deontic explosion”.
Keywords Command  Illocutionary act  Perlocutionary act  Conventional effect  Obligation  Preference  Deontic dilemma  Deontic explosion  Dynamic modal logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-008-9368-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,842
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Meaning.H. Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Preference Semantics for Imperatives.William B. Starr - 2020 - Semantics and Pragmatics 20.
The structure of communicative acts.Sarah E. Murray & William B. Starr - 2021 - Linguistics and Philosophy 44 (2):425-474.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
99 ( #105,667 of 60,800 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,061 of 60,800 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes